gavel.jpg

December 05, 2008

Providing legal resources and election news to California election officials and the attorneys who represent them.

California Election Law
 

« Previous | Main | Next »

November 20, 2005

"Voting machine company sued"

"Voting machine companies should have to abide by a new law requiring they turn over information on how their systems work, a Winston-Salem woman says in a court filing.

Joyce McCloy, founder of the N.C. Coalition for Verified Voting, wants a Wake County Superior Court judge to limit or remove an order that relieves companies from having to meet all the law's disclosure requirements.

Acceding to a request from Diebold Election Systems, Judge Howard E. Manning Jr. decided this month that companies competing to supply the state with voting machines won't be held liable if they don't provide all information about the machines' software and its creators, as spelled out in the law.

Diebold machines use software the company did not create, said Doug Hanna, a Raleigh lawyer representing the company. "The statute says all software and all programmers," he said. "There was a concern by the client that we wouldn't be able to comply 100 percent with the statute."

The company is still working to see if it is able to meet all disclosure requirements, he said.

According to the company Web site, Diebold has an election system that uses Microsoft Windows.

McCloy said the law was written to protect voters from machine malfunctions and botched elections.

"The law is to protect us," she said, "not this big corporation."

You can read the article here.

Posted by Randy Riddle at November 20, 2005 10:19 AM

September 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30


search the site
 


categories


resources


syndicate this blog 

 

© 2008 Randy Riddle